New Developments in Transplantation Medicine

Summer 1996

Volume 3, Number 1


NUTRITION

Tube Feeding

Malnutrition is common among organ transplant recipients and adversely affects transplant outcomes by prolonging hospital stays and increasing costs.1,2 Perioperative nutrition provides nutrients to meet patients' requirements for energy and healing. With the exception of kidney transplant patients, transplant recipients often are unable to consume adequate calories and protein for 5-10 days following surgery, despite being allowed to eat within three days postoperatively. Specialized nutrition support is required by approximately the fifth postoperative day for those patients who are unable to eat or when it is apparent that a patient will not be able to consume adequate amounts of nutrients from an oral diet. If a patient has a history of poor intake pretransplant or is severely malnourished, it is beneficial to initiate nutrition support earlier.

When nutrition support is required, tube feeding (TF) is preferred over total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for several reasons. Compared with TPN, TF preserves gut mass,3 attenuates the injury stress response,4 and maintains immunocompetence.5 Bacterial translocation, a process whereby indigenous bacteria colonizing the gut relocate extraluminally to mesenteric lymph nodes and systemic organs, can occur as a result of disruption in gut integrity, bacterial overgrowth in the gut, or impairment in the systemic and/or gut immune response.6 Although controversy exists as to the clinical significance of bacterial translocation in humans, TF reduces overall infection rates compared with TPN.7,8 Also, TF costs about one-eighth as much as TPN. The indications for tube feeding in transplant patients are listed in the table below.

INDICATIONS FOR TUBE FEEDING IN TRANSPLANT PATIENTS

Inability to eat
Ventilator dependency
Additional surgery
Altered mental status affecting ability to eat
Diminished nutrient intake
Anorexia
Dysgeusia from medications
Gastrointestinal problems including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and distention
Increased nutrient requirements
Hypermetabolism
Nitrogen loss caused by surgery and corticosteroid administration
Malabsorption

Patients are commonly selected for post-transplant TF on the basis of preexisting malnutrition or poor pretransplant nutrient intake. Posttransplant recovery in many organ transplant recipients is unpredictable, however, and well-nourished patients can suffer from postoperative complications that necessitate nutrition support as often as malnourished patients. Because it is difficult to predict which patients will have posttransplant problems, and several studies have shown positive outcomes from early (<48 hours) postoperative TF in other surgical populations, early posttransplant TF should be considered for transplant patients because nutritional inadequacy represents a frequent problem.

Three studies have investigated the role of early posttransplant TF among liver transplant recipients. In the first study, investigators randomly assigned 24 liver transplant patients to receive either enteral or parenteral nutritional support following transplantation.9 Fourteen patients began receiving tube feedings via a nasojejunal tube 18 hours after surgery, and TPN was initiated within 60 hours following transplantation in 10 patients. An equal amount of time was required for both patient groups to begin eating. No significant differences in anthropometric measurements, intestinal absorptive capacity, or infection rates were seen between the two groups.

Another transplant group retrospectively reviewed the experiences of 108 of their patients who had jejunostomy tubes placed while undergoing liver transplant surgery.10 These investigators concluded that jejunostomy tube feeding was well tolerated and reduced postoperative ileus and the need for TPN. However, complications related to the jejunostomy tube occurred in 16 patients, and surgery was required to correct these complications in seven cases.

Finally, we prospectively randomized 31 liver transplant patients to receive either immediate posttransplant TF or intravenous hydration.11 Tube feeding was initiated 12 hours posttransplant in 14 liver transplant patients via a nasointestinal tube, which did not cause any major complications. All patients began eating by approximately the third postoperative day. Tube-fed patients had superior nutrient intakes for the first 5 to 6 days posttransplant and better nitrogen balance on day 4 posttransplant. Viral infections occurred in 17.7% of control patients compared with 0% of TF patients (p=0.05). In addition, there was a trend for fewer tube-fed patients to have a bacterial or any type of infection compared with controls.

Adequate nutrition is vital for the recovery of transplant recipients. When oral feedings are not feasible or adequate, enteral feeding is preferred over TPN. Placement of nasointestinal feeding tubes during surgery alleviates problems and delays in providing enteral feeding access during the immediate posttransplant period. Early posttransplant TF via nasointestinal tubes is a low-risk, low-cost option and should be considered for patient groups in which adequate nutrition is frequently problematic.

Jeanette Hasse, PhD, RD
Baylor Institute of Transplantation Sciences
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas


REFERENCES

  1. Hasse JM, Blue LS, Crippin JS, et al. The effect of nutritional status on length of stay and clinical outcomes following liver transplantation. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94(suppl):A-38.
  2. Pikul J, Sharpe MD, Lowndes R, Ghent CN. Degree of preoperative malnutrition is predictive of postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 1994;57:469-472.
  3. Johnson LR, Copeland EM, Dudrick SJ, et al. Structural and hormonal alterations in the gastrointestinal tract of parenterally fed rats. Gastroenterology 1975;68:1177-1183.
  4. Saito H, Trocki O, Alexander JW, et al. The effect of route of nutrient administration on the nutritional state, catabolic hormone secretion and gut mucosal integrity after burn injury. JPEN 1987;11:1-7.
  5. Alverdy JC, Aoy SE, Moss GS. Total parenteral nutrition promotes bacterial translocation from the gut. Surgery 1988;104:185-190.
  6. Zaloga GP, MacGregor DA. What to consider when choosing enteral or parenteral nutrition: Is the guideline still `if the gut works, use it'? J Crit Illness 1990;5:1180-1200.
  7. Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ, et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications: The results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1992;216:172-183.
  8. Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding: Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 1992;215:503-511.
  9. Wicks C, Somasundaram S, Bjarnason I, et al. Comparison of enteral feeding and total parenteral nutrition after liver transplantation. Lancet 1994;344:837-840.
  10. Pescovitz MD, Mehta PL, Leapman SB, et al. Tube jejunostomy in liver transplant recipients. Surgery 1995;117:642-647.
  11. Hasse JM, Blue LS, Liepa GU, et al. Early enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing liver transplantation. JPEN 1995;19:437-443.

Back to Top · Return to Contents

Please be aware that medical advice, diagnoses and physician references cannot be obtained from this site.